Having watched all the videos I can find about this, it appears to me that Kyle Rittenhouse acted in legitimate self defense against an armed and violent mob. While his decision to be present in the area may not have been wise, when are 17-year-olds ever wise? His heart appears to have been in the right place, and I'm sure this experience will be very difficult for him. He has a legal defense fund, after gofundme shut down the first one.
The Food and Drug Administration has fired Emily Miller, a noted media figure and gun rights advocate, after only two weeks on the job as agency spokesperson. I'm familiar with her work from her gun rights advocacy and frankly I can't imagine this decision was made on anything other than political disagreements. Miller is competent, photogenic, has extensive media experience, and is perfectly capable of being polite and reasonable with people who disagree with her.
There is some hope; apparently the firing needs political approval from the White House.
Take with a grain of salt because it is coming from Brennan. If Durham isn't targeting Brennan, that leaves the crowd at the FBI at most risk (because they undeniably knew what was going on and continued to investigate and abuse the FISA process). Clapper and other CIA figures may also still be at risk. Still, Brennan was involved in briefing Congress about the Steele information and possibly in other activities before the FBI took up the baton.
Brennan does not deserve to escape scrutiny here, but if he has, it's an indication that Barr will not be pursuing this matter any higher, I think.
Mind you, it's pretty easy to become a target if you make a mistake and tell a provable lie during the interview, which reportedly took place over 8 hours in... Virginia, rather than DC, which would alter jury selection significantly if Brennan is charged for lying.
News article. Analysis. Full memo. This is the briefing given to then-candidate Trump during the election, which Strzok and Pientka sought to abuse for the purposes of their improper investigation into nonexistent Russian collusion.
Worth noting that one of the FBI officials involved in the briefly is the same one accused by IG Horowitz of altering an email to falsify the Carter Page FISA (ie, to hide that Page had been identified by the CIA as an asset).
In the comments from the analysis link is an interesting suggestion: The precise nature of the notes combined with the fact that they were written by the person giving the briefing suggests that the briefer or someone else at the meeting weas wearing a recording device and working from that recording to generate their notes, which were then filed into the investigative casefiles rather than as Presidential (candidate) briefing material.
Why the pandemic unemployment payments need to go down
For an unemployed couple, annualized, they paid $103,792 for doing nothing. Of course people turned down returning to their normal work when unemployment pays so well.
Three teens caught on Mar-a-Lago grounds with AK-47
Somehow, I don't believe these three armed intruders were intending anything good. You don't bring an AK-47 to a peaceful protest, especially not a loaded and concealed one. (I'm not a fan of rifles at open carry protests, though I understand and support the right to do so; those have nothing to do with this case).
The question now is.. who did Clinesmith roll over on? There are hints in Durhams "criminal information" (like an indictment, but without the grand jury) that suggests Clinesmith was central to the Russiagate hoax investigation AND the Mueller special counsel investigation. if Clinesmith is actually cooperating, lots of his colleagues should be sweating, especially as the original, correct version of the email he modified went to Comey, McCabe, and others who had a duty to inform the FISC.